Pavel3 píše:Neber to, co jsem napsal, ve zlém.

bh69 píše:z uvedenyho teda asi vyplyva, ze by asi byl nesmysl ted M-DAC vracet

bh69 píše:Otazka teda spis zni - jaky zesilovac (a pripadne reprosoustavy) za rozumnou cenu ?

Pavel3 píše:Nechci se do dalších diskuzí moc pouštět (a ani nemám v zesácích až tak přehled), chtěl jsem jen obhájit MDAC, o jehož kvalitách jsem přesvědčen. Poslouchám poslední dobou hlavně na sluchátka a vyhovuje mi to.

bh69 píše:ok, myslel jsem, ze mas i nromalni sestavu zesik-repro

bh69 píše:ještě poslední dotaz k M-DAC - je normálni, ze tak intenzivně hřeje ? horní plocha je docela horká, ruku bych na ní neudržel

I had many and very different DACs in the past. My beloved Stokes DIY Tube DAC was restricted to S/PDIF and red-book 44/16 audio. I plunged into computer audio with a not-so-great Headroom USB DAC. Then I hot rodded an Apogee Mini FireWire DAC with a hefty DIY power supply. I use an Audiolab M-DAC in our living-room system (and it tends to break from time to time). My main system had a Linnenberg UDC1. And I've listened to the Weiss and many other cost-a-lot stuff. However, while some of those DACs sound pretty good compared to others, they all screw up the music in the same way. And I don't mean the painful "S" sounds and similar boorishness from crummy DACs. Even the «good» DACs take away the life, flesh and breath from the music, very much in contrast my trusted vinyl rig (Scheu platter and bearing, Teres motor, and Schröder arm). The Stokes Tube DAC and the Audiolab M-DAC both allow using different built-in digital filters with different characteristics. The different filters usually sound slightly different, and some sound «better» than others, but they never get rid of the artificial sound completely. But, maybe unfortunately, the filters cannot be turned off completely.

Pavel3 píše:O těch emocích a hudebnosti by to bylo pořád dokola